made in like 4 hours on an empty stomach for the manifesto jam 2026, using my love letter engine. photos and drawings by me. all instances of synthetic content have been omitted.

html transcript on my website.

stuff mentioned:

Published 22 hours ago
StatusReleased
PlatformsHTML5
Rating
Rated 5.0 out of 5 stars
(4 total ratings)
Authorsolflo
GenreVisual Novel
Made withLÖVE
Tagsmanifesto
Average sessionA few minutes
LanguagesEnglish
ContentNo generative AI was used

Comments

Log in with itch.io to leave a comment.

RIP to @ai_metal_bot, your images used to be so interesting before the AI boom

yeah.. im not a user and i dont think i have ever used any of the old generators and all that but like.. i sorta hate how like everything just falls under "ai" bc i actually love the idea of like using ur own art to have a machine make stuff with it.. kinda the whole thing with like an avatar generator when u set it to random and it picks stuff from the assets it has. i think curation has a lot to do this it.. and purpose and intent.. like a friend had a twitter account that was a bunch of stuff they wrote but like it chose how to mash stuff up from the database or whatever.. how is that really that diff from "ai" writing when "ai" is taking writing from the internet/etc that other people wrote and mashing it up? its just hateful that "ai" is being added to like everything where its making shit worse.. and trying to replace people.. meh its complex

(+1)

as ai hype starts to die down a bit, i feel that some space lets up for conversations like this. well, maybe it's wrong to say ai hype is dying down. maybe we're all just getting used to talking and thinking about it.

> since when do we all believe in the sanctity of copyright and in the immortal human soul?

it is so unfortunate how "ai" use has been pushed by corporations as a means of cutting costs and accelerating productivity. and im happy that our creative communities have taken such a strong stance against that. at the same time there are genuine ways of artistic exploration using these tools and methods, ones that dont benefit these corps. so yes i agree!

#yup

wouldn't it be crazy if there was another jam playing with the artistic intent of genAI

may we set our bones down instead of picking them in the future with our friends

(+2)

An interesting perspective, I mostly agree with you. I don't like genAI, or rather what it's become synonymous with... The fast, cheap, cookie-cutter, everything-looks-the-same-now way of making things really appeals to people with no artistic sensibilities and that don't want to pay for assets. I also think a lot of (commonly chronically online) artists pay far too much attention to the «content theft» side of things (which I couldn't care less about) rather than the real issues with the practice, such as the mentioned environmental impact.

I'd be lying if I said AI-generated images/videos of old weren't deeply fascinating to me (nowadays they're commonly referred to as AI hallucinations, which I find to be simply inaccurate as machines aren't sentient, and even if they were how would they be able to perceive the world the same way we do?). But, the community surrounding these things aren't artists nor even art appreciators.

I once learned of an incredibly skilled artist that was once creating his own AI image generator from scratch based on his own images (I believe it was a glitch artist called Rui Martins, here's his Tumblr). My dad, a former graphic designer, had a lot of fun creating things with legacy Midjourney. Then the culture surrounding AI changed because it became mainstream.

I hope I'm making some sort of sense. Without being too much of a hipster, I feel that the only way to make generative AI not suck is to make it uncool, so I'm inclined to side with the «no AI» rule.

(+3)

as a certified AI hater, I actually mostly agree with all of this. I do see artistic merit in exploring the latent space of machine learning, combing through the machine's hallucinations to find something strangely beautiful. 

but I don't think there's anyway around the fact that if you don't put these disclaimers about no AI, you're not really going to get a lot of that... you're going to get sludge. you're going to get people who see the craft of creation as an obstacle rather than the point using AI to pump out art where all the decisions were made by a machine whose entire purpose is to create a randomized average of art. 

I'm no copyright supporter by any means, but it's hard to ignore the malice in big tech's use of artists' data--they don't seek to help us, only to replace us. 

I would like to go back to the days of ganbreeder--I played with it a lot myself back in the day, and it was really fun!--but I don't know how we can do that without opening the door to the right wing art haters. I hate to cede ground to them, but there's no way around the fact that they have claimed the territory. 

I'm not sure how to reclaim machine learning as a genuine artistic tool without supporting their agenda when the people making the largest and most prominent models are right wingers themselves. 

i absolutely agree that noAI tagging effectively functions as an anti-shovelware filter nowadays. to me it’s kinda like asset flipping, in that undoubtedly there are devs making good work that’s only possible through pre-made and stock assets, even though the overwhelming majority isn’t. how do you separate chaff from wheat? i don’t think it’s possible in a large platform: passing judgement on each individual work is unfeasible. maybe with smaller collectives, webrings and the like.

ultimately i think the way to not be lumped with the lame mainstream right-wing crowd is to just make work that’s obviously ideologically different. it’s not really a matter of Reclaiming AI into a leftist technology through putting together the greatest talent show this town has ever seen, but just like: i’m so deeply uninterested in the themes and aesthetics of right-wing creative production that i just have to put faith in my audience to understand what i’m doing, to see the existence of an artistic vision, the use of the medium as a deliberate choice. from the reception of my work, i believe i’ve been successful, even if i do still feel nervous at times.

i think it’s reductive to say the medium is unsalvageable because of the ideology of the corporations / startups in the space. in fact i believe openai and the like benefit from the perception that they are synonymous with AI and that it is and can only be a service provided by big corporations. when in reality people have been running open source models themselves and training their own stuff etc. perception has never really been about truth, though, which is why it’s complicated.